NO STRANGER !

Recent findings state that most abductions are not strangers they are in fact familiar with the person. They either know them directly or indirectly. A possibility could be the home or where Amy lived, the stables where she rode her horse, or at mom's work place. The reason for that is because of the mothers sudden change in work hours, and they took note of that. This person then was aware of a window of opportunity. By watching the mother he saw that he had the chance to go from fantasy to reality. So the mother is the key to all this , not that the mother done anything, it was her sudden change in work hours that made it possible for Amy to be available. So, one the question was, what happened in the fall of 89. The answer is the time frame had changed. I'm just not thinking that something happened to the killer in 89 that caused him to react in this manner.

What's your opinion?

Moving on……………..

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

BACK TO THE BASICS

I know it's been some time since anyone heard a word on Amy's case. So , I thought I'd go back again to the beginning and see just what might have slipped through our radar.

1. Spaetzel had said "we found a yellow, gold fiber at the recovery site, possibly from a 79 ford or a camper". This is in James book page 239.

2. I know the FBI had questioned Al Matlock earlier in the case and continue to show interest in this person after all these years, Why is that?

3. Ashland County has an interest in Al Matlock also, according to Roger Martin they have a warrant on him. Martin claimed Al matlock was in West Virginia.

4. Doyle Matlock ,and Al Matlock did have a cousin that lived on the corner of County Rd. 1181 and 126.

5. Doyle said to the Greenwich police chief Verberg that his uncle lived near the intersection where Amy was found. (1181, 126) He also said his cousin lives in Kentucky. James book page 127.

6. Doyle was very evasive about his family connections. Doyle grew up with his grand parents, his mother lives in Cleveland. Doyle lived near where Amy was from /Amherst a suburb near Bay. Doyle moved not far away from where the body was found. James book page 194.

7. Doyle also said he heard it on a scanner when they found her and went to his cousins house to tell them the road would be blocked by the cops soon. He knows how cops work. Renner wondered why Doyle would be listening to the scanner at 7:30 in the morning.

8. In 2005 Doyle was approximately 40 yrs. old. At that time he lived in Polk Ohio, his some time girlfriend ( Lori Ann French Right) lived in nearby Greenwich. Right was apparently leaving Doyle for good ( a domestic squabble ensued ). Doyle stabbed Right more than 20 times in the head chest and right arm. He attacked her with such force the knife blade broke off in her skull.

9. Doyle plead guilty to the charges and for exchange of 20 to life in prision. No one from Doyle's family was there when he was sentenced.

10. Pat Stokes claimed she met Margaret at Joann Stillions a year prior to Amy going missing. Years later Joann told Pat that when they find out who done it, it would be Buds boy ( Doyles cousin on 126).

11. Bill Hayes ( found in James book pg. 181- 182) called James on the phone after he read the request for information about Amy which James had placed in the Ashland newspaper. That conversation is a must read! It does connect Al Matlock to the cabin and much much more!Were all three cousins involved?

12. That log house comes up again in conversation of Ann on crime rant. People in the know!

13. A rumor going around that area stated that the FBI told the parents of there dead daughter that the same three men killed her that killed Amy. They just couldn't prove it.

14. Al Matlock was known to kidnap girls, one fell out of his van and crawled across U.S. 250 to the Norwalk hospital. Bill Hayes later found out it was his van that Matlock used without his knowledge.

15. Doyle told all his friends he killed Amy.

16. Crystal(? ) from Elyria gave some information to the FBI connecting Amy's family to Al Matlock back about 2/12 years ago.

All these things have been talked about before , have we missed anything, what's your opinion?

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

Moving On.................

ALL RIGHT BAY VILLAGE!

 http://www.fox8.com/videobeta/a99873e6-221c-47df-82ee-96f5301c9e66/News/Bay-Village-Police-Want-Dienes-Interview

Moving on........

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

OH REALLY!!

Frank Dienes pleaded guilty to the murder of Joe Kopp. The TV interview with Franks wife Char left me with thoughts of, ARE YOU KIDDING ME! Char claims that it was self defense. I don't know about anyone else but I know for a fact that if someone is making threats against your life they can and have been removed from their own property. People don't have to take the law into their own hands and take the life of the person bothering them. So with Joe living at the Dienes house, why didn't Frank or anyone else in the house just call police and have them take Joe away? Char claims she knows her husband and he would have never done anything to hurt Amy. I say poppy cock! Char said she didn't know anything about Joe being killed and buried in the families backyard for a month, so how can she say something so stupid? Char didn't know Frank back in 1989, so what else doesn't she know about what her husband can do? I've heard love is blind , but deaf and dumb too? Oh Please.. are we to believe that Char or anyone else at that house didn't notice tracks in the yard or fresh mud leading into the house? What about that lump of dirt that wasn't there in the fall? Here's one for ya, how about the fact that Joe didn't show his face for an entire month anywhere! So Char wasn't home when the shooting took place, how convenient for Frank. The fatal shot going into Joe's head was also a red flag to me. Didn't they say there was a struggle? How odd the shot hit Joe where it did. Guaranteed Joe wouldn't talk after that.

As for Amy Mihaljevic, the wheels of justice still turn and I'm betting that the Bay Village police and the FBI and a few others are looking at Frank Dienes real hard. How could they not? After all the things that have been said about Joe Kopp telling people that he knew for a fact that Frank killed Amy. The rumors swirled like wildfire. Here are just a few that I've come across here on the net and in private conversations with others.

Franks grandfather was the only person in Franks life that cared about him.

Franks father kidnapped his mother at a very young age from Hungary, took her to Canada and married her keeping her from ever seeing her family again.

Frank was doing what he thought was right when it came to taking a wife, he took Amy as his own.

What kind of trouble was Frank in when he was a teen that caused him to be sent away?

Franks grandfather did die in the fall of 1988. Looks pretty close to 1989 to me.

Joe must have had some kind of knowledge that tied Frank to Amy, if it was only just a smidge.

Here's one for ya, what if Char talked Frank into pleading guilty because she was afraid he might come back home!!!

Moving On....................

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

" LET'S TAKE ANOTHER LOOK SHALL WE"

TEN YEAR REPORT

Presented here, for the first time, is the closest description of the Unknown Male what he looks like, what he does, how he behaves, where he lives. Obviously, because his identity remains unknown, these are theories, not facts, but if recent history is any indication, when he is finally caught, he will be remarkably close to much of the description provided by FBI experts. One crucial aspect of the revised “profile” relates to the ubiquitous poster of the suspect. Remember the undistinguished drawing of the slightly built man, unremarkable in appearance? Forget it. At least for now, set it aside. It could be that the Poster Man is not an accurate portrayal of the Unknown Male. The description provided by witnesses was based on fleeting glimpses of a man seen approaching Amy, but not in actual contact with her. There was no reason to scrutinize him and nothing extraordinary about his actions or appearance. Wrenn emphasizes that “people should not hesitate to contact us if they have some information, but the man doesn’t look like the drawing I can’t say that strongly enough.”The rest is a behavioral composite based on 10 years of available information. The offender is a white male. At the time of the crime, he was in his mid- to late 30s, older than average for a first-time child aggressor. He is not remarkable in appearance, within average ranges of height, weight and build. He may look presentable, but not accomplished or professional. “He is socially marginalized, ” according to Etter. “Not in the mainstream, not a run-of-the-mill citizen.”“He won’t fit in with his peers very well, especially women,” adds Lord, “and the people who know him will describe him as ‘odd’ or ‘difficult.’ It’s likely that he was living alone, with a single roommate, or maybe still at his parents’ house.” It is most unlikely he was in a successful marriage, with a normal home and family life.One of the most intriguing aspects of the report is that the killer was most likely to have undergone some sort of dramatic change in his behavior, personality or appearance in the weeks preceding the crime. He developed a sudden compulsive or obsessive disorder, experienced a personal catastrophe or an emotional setback. “He may have started drinking heavily, or stopped drinking suddenly,” says Wrenn. “He could have started into hard drugs or quit a drug habit.” There was a drastic change in his life, maybe a sudden fascination with a cult or radical religious group. Something happened to this man in the fall of 1989, something that would have been noticeable to close friends or relatives.” There was a pre-event stressor,” says Lord, “something that took him from fantasy to action.”The stress in his life may have been reflected in a dramatic change in his physical appearance. He let his hair grow long or cut it very short. His health suffered. His weight fluctuated. There were changes in his appearance or lifestyle.In addition, one important logistical aspect should be noted. This man was not passing through. Contrary to the family’s trusting conviction that no one known to any of them was involved, authorities are confident that the Unknown Male has “… reason to know this area,” according to Etter; “A resident, a contract worker or delivery person familiar with Bay Square.” Lord cites the need for such a predator to select a “hunting ground where he can … move comfortably through the tall grass.”Lord explains that the Ashland County location is just as important. “This was not random,” he says. “When you are disposing of something thatc ould ruin your entire life, you’re going to be careful.” The Unknown Male knew County Road 1181. He had been on that lonely stretch of asphalt before. He knew he could quickly place Amy’s body just over a shallow ridge a few yards from the pavement and expect it would go undiscovered for weeks or months. Wrenn confirms the conclusion: “Yes, we think he was familiar with Bay Village and familiar with the area in Ashland.”The experts go another step. “We believe he had knowledge of the family,” says Etter, “personal knowledge in considerable detail.”The most disturbing part of the report concerns his behavior since the crime. Because there has not been a similar crime reported at least nothing like the complicated telephone plot to lure Amy to a deadly rendezvous the general perception is that, to the best of the investigators’ knowledge, the Unknown Male has never claimed another victim.“We don’t know that he hasn’t done this again,” says Etter. “He may have left the area and done something far away, orhe may have changed his M.O.” Etter goes on to explain the difference between an M.O. and the signature of a criminal. “An M.O. is just what works,and it can vary,” he notes. “The signature aspects of a crime do not vary they are fundamental.” Because of the single known crime and limited evidence, there is no known signature in Amy’s case. The unique M.O. the phone-call setup may have evolved to a different tactic.The best hope experts cite for new information is from past victims, and they believe there may have been some who have never spoken up. “If you look at the statistics,” says Etter, “it is likely this person had criminal sexual contact with other female children and some of those acts may not yet have been reported.”

DOES ANY OF THIS MATCH DIENES? WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

I read somewhere that Dienes was very close to his grandfather because he was about the only person that was nice to him as a child. I also read where the grandfather died in the fall of 1988. I'm just wondering how much leeway the profile has.

Moving on............

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

THIS MAY BE THE YEAR THAT TELLS THE TALE

Again it's getting closer to another anniversary of Amy gone missing, this time it may be just a bit different as there is a chance that a solid lead to her abductor and killer may be known.

The case of Frank Dienes, the guy that shot Joe Kopp in the head and killed him, then buried him in his own back yard has started to turn the corner. Joe's story was that Frank killed Amy, and as luck would have it Frank disagreed. I've always heard that there is some truth in stories even if it's just a smidge. So what do you think Joe had on Frank? Well, maybe we will find that out when the trial starts. Could be nothing at all, however I'm not going to miss that case because there's just to many things that match up in Amy's case to Frank Dienes. Granted there are others but they didn't seem to fit as well as Frank. I can say that if Frank didn't have anything to do with it then the person that did fits Franks profile very close.

Moving on......................

letshearit2010@hotmail.com

UPDATE

MORE ON FRANK DIENES

http://www.fox8.com/videobeta/2f9a5814-9fd1-4ba5-be85-edbcc38329a2/News/Murder-Suspect-s-Competency-Tested

 letshearit2010@hotmail.com

Moving on......